Charlie Kirk: The Man in the Arena

Before anything else can be said, our hearts must turn to Charlie Kirk’s beloved wife and their young children. No words can carry the weight of their loss, nor can they ease the deep grief of a family suddenly bereft of a husband and father. As a community, we are called to weep with those who weep (Romans 12:15), to uphold them in prayer, and to surround them with tangible love and care. Their sorrow is heavy, but they do not walk alone. May the Lord, who is “a father to the fatherless and a defender of widows” (Psalm 68:5), be their refuge and strength in these dark days. I pray that his children, though deprived of his presence, may one day see clearly that their father’s courage and faith were godly and true. Yet we acknowledge with broken hearts that it would have been far better for them to have their father by their side.

Deacon Stephen, the first to be killed for his belief in Jesus, asked, “Which of the prophets did your fathers not persecute?” (Acts 7:52).

In every respect, Charlie Kirk was a godly prophet—courageous in ways that many seasoned leaders in the church often fail to be. One reason why so many young adults were drawn to him and his open forums was that he was willing to discuss any subject, debate any topic, and wrestle with what God’s Word and his Christian faith had to say about it. Nothing was ever off the table. Most of us would never submit our deeply held convictions about faith and politics to the public, content to speak only in safe spaces and behind cloistered walls. But not Charlie Kirk—he was brave enough to take the truth of God into the arena.

I have noticed that some are cynically commenting on the irony of his defense of the Second Amendment. Of course, gun control is a hot topic in our public debate. But so too should be the heart, mind, and ideologies behind those who would assassinate defenders of rights and freedom. The defense of our freedoms carries inherent risk. Charlie Kirk was brave, truth-speaking, public. He submitted himself and his ideas to debate and scrutiny. He was open and vulnerable—vulnerable to being proven wrong, vulnerable to having his ideas tested, vulnerable to public ridicule and scorn, vulnerable to being canceled, vulnerable even to being killed.

By contrast, the assassin is a coward. He hides in the shadows, under cover of darkness. He is faithless, a hater of truth and light—evil. God sees and knows, and the assassin has done evil in the sight of the Lord (Proverbs 15:3).

“Which of the prophets did your fathers not persecute?” (Acts 7:52). The words of Jesus also ring true: “O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the city that kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to it!” (Matthew 23:37). Unfortunately, these words have been fulfilled again.

Charlie Kirk stood up for family, for moral clarity, for the freedom of inalienable rights, and for divine truth. And for that, he was murdered in the public square. I cannot help but think about the call of Jesus before he ascended: “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the end of the earth” (Acts 1:8).

Charlie Kirk was courageously faithful to this mission. He was a witness for Jesus Christ, relying on the empowerment of the Holy Spirit to give him the words. In the early church, the Greek word behind our English “witness” became synonymous with giving up one’s life for the faith. That word is martyr. Charlie Kirk is a witness—and a martyr—for Jesus Christ.

There are seasons when culture becomes corrupt through godless thinking. Ours is such a season, and we need more Charlie Kirks to stand up and speak. Of course, he has shown us the cost of such a stand. Each of us must summon our own courage and be responsible for our own witness. At times, Jesus spoke boldly, and at times, he remained silent (cf. John 18:33–37; Mark 14:61). We are called to be “wise as serpents and innocent as doves” (Matthew 10:16ff.). Persecution will come. The days are evil (Ephesians 5:16). We are also called to be the salt of the earth and the light of the world (Matthew 5:13–16). Charlie Kirk rightly critiqued the church for too often hiding its light under a bushel and losing its saltiness.

It has often been said in moments like this: “The blood of the martyrs is the seed of the church.” Church history is replete with those who bravely faced the sword, imprisonment, stoning, wild beasts, fire, and the cross—all to bear witness in Jesus’ name. These are those “of whom the world is not worthy” (cf. Hebrews 11:35–38). Their martyrdoms never go unnoticed. They become beacons of greater faith and courage by those who share their beliefs. Not only does the Lord see their testimony, but so does a watching world. This is the paradoxical power of the cross and the crucified life. To the world it is foolishness, but to us who are being saved, it is the power of God (1 Corinthians 1:18).

Charlie Kirk’s ministry was called Turning Point. The name itself is inspirational, envisioning young adults recognizing their calling to be the change in this world. We are indeed in a time where we need a turning point—for our culture, our country, and our world—to turn back to God and to faithfulness to His Word. This too is a prophetic call. Just as 9/11/2001 became a turning point when many turned to the Lord in the face of horrific evil, may September 10, 2025, be the prescient moment of a turning point for renewed witness for Jesus Christ in the public arena.

Here Roosevelt’s words seem prophetic: “It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles… The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood… who errs, who comes short again and again… but who does actually strive to do the deeds… who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly.” Charlie Kirk dared greatly, because he was the man who was actually in the arena.

Evil may think it has won a victory in silencing a compelling voice and extinguishing a bright light for God. But this is Satan’s downfall. The cross of Jesus Christ is the true victory. Those who pick up their cross and follow Him will overcome, tearing down the gates of hell “by the blood of the Lamb and by the word of their testimony, for they loved not their lives even unto death” (Revelation 12:11).

I would love for you to express your thoughts on my blog in order to strengthen our common conversation. What is your take away from this post? What question does the post leave you wondering? Let's get some discussion going! Please note that for the sake of the trust of my readers, I do reserve the right to remove comments that are offensive or off-topic.

14 thoughts on “Charlie Kirk: The Man in the Arena

  1. Dear Rev. Holt. Your “Engaging Truth” has stricken both my comments on your hagiography of Charlie Kirk. You guys are so transparent. I pity the fool, as Mr. T would say.

  2. Why am I not surprise that you killed my comment on your remarks. Just like Charlie, keep the comments or the debates that make you look good and throw out rest. Hypocrites!

  3. This first paragraph was a nice testament. The rest is delusional. Charlie was public and wrong. You cannot profess to be a Christian while hating half the county. There are only two genders, wrong. That is an opinion among some close-minded people, primarily evangelical Christians. In other cultures, five genders are recognized, cis-gender male and females, gay men, lesbians, and those born with gender dysphoria or intersex. Charlie’s comments of George Floyd, black women of accomplishment; Kamala Harris, Katanji Jackson, Michelle Obama, among others if not racist, just ignorant. He was a bomb thrower and proto-Christian Nationalist. One can memorize the Bible (or the Koran), know all the verses, but completely miss the point. What would Jesus do? Certainly, not Charlie.

    • Jane,
      Thank you for commenting, we are coming from a different perspective on gender. I do not see gender as a social construct, but a divine ordering from the beginning. I do like your idea of asking “what would Jesus do?”

      He actually spoke to the subject of gender and marriage recorded in Matthew:
      4 He said to them,
      “Have you not read that He Who made them in the first place made them man and woman? 5 It says, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and his mother and will live with his wife. The two will become one.’ 6 So they are no longer two but one. Let no man divide what God has put together.”

      Not only did Jesus affirm the two genders outlined in Genesis. But he also affirmed that marriage is a divine ordering and institution, not a social construct.

      Again, thank you for your post.

  4. Born & raised at St. Marks in my youth in the Douglas Leatherbury era, I appreciate the on line services & your sermons. That said, I’m ambivalent at best about Charlie Kirk. I saw much of what I would call political flame throwing with occasional glimpses of earnest feeling. Though I would identify him as a Christian nationalist, I must admit that “man looketh on the outward appearance, but the Lord looketh at the heart”. The judge of all the earth will do right.

  5. Wow you penned it just right. You can see the chasm of good and evil in how his death is being handled and perceived. I take courage in knowing he is in heaven with Jesus and that the seeds he planted will bloom and grow. In this dark world, he was courageous and the happy warrior. May he rest in peace and thank you for articulating this so well. God bless <+

  6. Thank you, Rev. Holt! I completely agree with your post and your call: “We are indeed in a time where we need a turning point—for our culture, our country, and our world—to turn back to God and to faithfulness to His Word.”
    Your ministry has been a blessing to the people of Houston and Florida, and I hope that you continue to speak boldly for God’s word. You are an inspiration to me and my wife to do the same.

  7. Your commentary about the killing of Charlie Kirk, age 31, is so well done and appropriate that it should be widely published on the internet and every major newspaper in the country. We should all pray for his wife and family, and grieve with them for our loss of a courageous, “National Treasure.” The contributions he could have made to this nation and the world are incalculable. May he rest in peace.

Comments are closed.